So when Icke and his like say the EU is a faceless bureaucracy serving the interests of big business, they are tapping into the first kind. When they suggest that Hillary Clinton is a flesh-eating lizard in a rubber mask, or that Neocons brought down the twin towers, they are tapping into the second.
Further examples of the first kind...
- The internet is a playground for pervs and paedophiles
- Islam is a dangerous religion
- White working class people are missing out on housing and other social services due to uncontrolled immigration
- Michael Gove is a flesh-eating lizard (Boom tish!)
The latter category of conspiracy is undoubtedly becoming more prevalent in contemporary discourse, perhaps because the purveyors of paranoia have seen how the impersonal forces of globalisation have left more and more people feeling disempowered, and thus susceptible.
Even those who have specialised in Type II conspiracies - like David Icke - have widened their repertoire to include more of the Type I narratives.
So, where does the whole 'Jeremy Corbyn is unelectable' conspiracy fit into this? First kind or second kind?
Like chemtrails or 'the Mexicans are about to attack', it looks like a binary at first glance. However...